literature-management

Import local literature into a managed library; trigger when you need offline deduplication, tagging, and a searchable index.

Quality

72%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./scientific-skills/Other/literature-management/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content has a solid, well-organized core covering usage, inputs/outputs, dedup rules, and file organization, with an executable import command. It is weakened by substantial generic boilerplate sections and by referencing bundle files that are not actually present.

Suggestions

Remove or collapse the generic boilerplate sections ('When Not to Use', 'Required Inputs', 'Recommended Workflow', 'Output Contract', 'Validation and Safety Rules', 'Failure Handling', 'Input Validation', 'Quick Validation') into literature-management-specific guidance to improve conciseness.

Add an explicit validate->fix->retry feedback loop for the batch import (e.g., how to handle dedup collisions and re-run a corrected import) to raise workflow clarity above the batch-operation cap of 3.

Either provide the referenced `scripts/import_library.py`, `scripts/requirements.txt`, and `references/examples.md` bundle files, or remove the references to them, so progressive disclosure points to real content.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The core sections (Implementation Details, Example Usage) are efficient, but roughly half the body ('When Not to Use', 'Required Inputs', 'Recommended Workflow', 'Output Contract', 'Validation and Safety Rules', 'Failure Handling', 'Input Validation', 'Quick Validation') is generic boilerplate restating general best practices rather than literature-management specifics.	3 / 5
Actionability	It provides a concrete, copy-paste-ready `python scripts/import_library.py` command with flags plus a `--help` verification command, but stops short of showing implementation-level code for the dedup/index logic, leaving minor gaps.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	This is a batch import operation with a verification step ('After running, verify ...'), but the Recommended Workflow and Quick Validation are generic boilerplate with no explicit validate->fix->retry feedback loop for batch/dedup errors, so the batch-operation cap of 3 applies.	3 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	The body references `references/examples.md`, `scripts/requirements.txt`, and `scripts/import_library.py`, but no references/ or scripts/ directories exist, so the signaled references are not actually available; structure is present but references are not clearly delivered.	3 / 5
	Total	13 / 20 Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: it concisely states both the capability set and an explicit trigger clause with concrete natural phrases. Its only weakness is a lack of file-extension/synonym coverage that would push trigger-term quality to the top anchor.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain ('local literature') and several concrete actions — 'Import', 'offline deduplication', 'tagging', and 'searchable index' — which is several specific actions rather than 1-2, though slightly less comprehensive than the 5-anchor example.	4 / 5
Completeness	It explicitly answers both what ('Import local literature into a managed library; ... offline deduplication, tagging, and a searchable index') and when ('trigger when you need ...') with concrete trigger phrases, matching the 5-anchor.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	The 'trigger when you need offline deduplication, tagging, and a searchable index' phrase uses natural task-oriented terms a user would say, but omits common synonyms and file extensions (PDF, BibTeX, .bib, RIS) that the 5-anchor requires.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The niche of offline, local literature library management with dedup/tag/index is clearly distinct with specific triggers and minimal overlap risk against generic skills.	5 / 5
	Total	18 / 20 Passed

Validation

87%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning
referenced_paths_exist	Referenced path issues: 4 missing	Warning

	Total	14 / 16 Passed

Repository: aipoch/medical-research-skills
Path: scientific-skills/Other/literature-management/SKILL.md
Commit: f5ef65b

Reviewed: ~17 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.