Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exceptionally actionable and well-sequenced workflow with robust validation checkpoints and clean progressive disclosure into real bundle files. The only weak spot is mild redundancy from repeated detail-pointer callouts.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated 'Detailed instructions: See references/workflow-details.md Stage N' callouts into a single staged reference map to reduce redundant tokens.
Trim restated mandates (e.g., the sub-heading requirement appears in both Stage 1 and Stage 3) by cross-referencing instead of repeating.
Move the duplicated 'do not cite in Abstract/Conclusion' rule to one canonical Core Principles entry rather than restating it per stage.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean imperative instructions with concrete commands, but recurring 'Detailed instructions: See references...' callouts and restated mandates add minor over-explanation that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable copy-paste-ready commands with exact flags, naming conventions, and quantitative thresholds (150 PMIDs, <7000 chars, >2 refs/sentence) cover the common cases throughout every stage. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six clearly sequenced stages with explicit validation via check_section.py, a state-machine feedback loop, post-write supplementation, and user-confirmation gates before proceeding — strong checkpoints and error recovery for a batch/file workflow. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The SKILL.md body is a clear overview pointing one level deep to references/workflow-details.md, references/citation-guide.md, assets/Review_Final.md, and named scripts — all verified to exist, well-signaled, and appropriately split. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |