Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-engineered, highly actionable skill body: concrete commands with exact arguments, quantified acceptance thresholds, a state-machine-driven six-stage workflow with explicit validation and user checkpoints, and clean one-level-deep progressive disclosure into real bundle files. The only slack is minor redundancy (the sub-heading rule stated twice) and generic closing validation boilerplate.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and entirely task-specific with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, but the 2-4 sub-heading mandate is repeated nearly verbatim in Stage 1 and Stage 3, and the closing 'Input Validation'/'Quick Validation' sections read as generic template boilerplate that could be trimmed. These are minor instances of over-writing, not padded or verbose sections. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance throughout: exact script invocations with arguments ('python scripts/pubmed_search.py "QUERY" --section "introduction|section_1|..."', 'python scripts/check_section.py "section_1.md"', 'merge_review.py abstract.md introduction.md section_1.md ... -o Review_Final.md', 'revert_citations.py Review_Final_Formatted.md -o draft.md') plus quantified acceptance criteria (>=150 unique PMIDs, <7000 characters per chapter, no more than 2 references per sentence). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six explicitly sequenced stages with a state machine printing next-step guidance after each script run, mandatory verification after each chapter with concrete remediation loops (--post-write supplementary searches, expanding sub-headings, splitting dense citations), user checkpoints after the outline and each chapter, and a dedicated Failure Handling section. Validation and feedback loops are explicit and pervasive. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview that links each stage to the specific stage of references/workflow-details.md or references/citation-guide.md (both files exist, are one level deep, and contain no nested references), points to assets/Review_Final.md as the format exemplar, and closes with a Resource Files section mapping the bundle. Navigation is easy and appropriately split. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |