Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A strong, actionable skill body with clear workflow validation and well-organized references. Main gaps are minor padding (checklist, bibliography) and a few broken file references in the testing/prerequisites sections.
Suggestions
Remove or relocate the 'Implementation Checklist' and bibliographic 'References' sections — they describe meta-status and citations rather than executable guidance.
Fix or remove references to non-existent bundle files (scripts/install_dependencies.R, tests/data/sample_clinical_survival_data.csv, tests/run_smoke_test.R, tests/run_smoke_test.sh).
Verify the optparse/--help note reflects actual behavior or move it into troubleshooting.md to keep the body lean.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient actionable reference (args table, CLI, error table), but the 'Implementation Checklist' and bibliographic 'References' sections add tokens Claude does not need and could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready CLI commands, a complete arguments table, concrete CSV input examples, and an error-code table cover the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 4-step workflow with explicit validation checkpoints (column/sample/event counts) in Steps 1–2 and a feedback loop directing to troubleshooting.md on persistent errors. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good one-level-deep structure with a 'When to Read External Files' table pointing to real references, but several referenced paths (scripts/install_dependencies.R, tests/data/..., tests/run_smoke_test.*) do not exist in the bundle. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |