molecular-review-workflow
Generates academic reviews for molecules in diseases using PubMed research. Invoke when user needs biomedical literature review with Vancouver citation format.
54
43%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./scientific-skills/Academic Writing/molecular-review-workflow/SKILL.mdSecurity
1 medium severity finding. This skill can be installed but you should review these findings before use.
W011: Third-party content exposure detected (indirect prompt injection risk)
What this means
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
Why it was flagged
Third-party content exposure detected (high risk: 0.70). This skill's scripts (scripts/pubmed_api.py) explicitly call the NCBI Entrez API to search and fetch PubMed articles (public third‑party content) which the workflow then reads and uses to generate reviews, so externally authored content can directly influence the agent's analysis and actions.
- Repository
- aipoch/medical-research-skills
- Commit
8277276
- Audited
- Security analysis
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.