molecular-review-workflow
Generates academic reviews for molecules in diseases using PubMed research. Invoke when user needs biomedical literature review with Vancouver citation format.
47
51%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./scientific-skills/Academic Writing/molecular-review-workflow/SKILL.mdSecurity
1 medium severity finding. This skill can be installed but you should review these findings before use.
W011: Third-party content exposure detected (indirect prompt injection risk)
What this means
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
Why it was flagged
Third-party content exposure detected (high risk: 0.85). At runtime the workflow executes PubMed searches via NCBI Entrez API and ingests PubMed record text/abstracts into the generated review context, which is outsider-authored free text from a public biomedical database.
- Repository
- aipoch/medical-research-skills
- Commit
7cc5680
- Audited
- Security analysis
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.