Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, highly directive control document with a clear sequenced workflow, mandatory validation, and a clean one-level reference layer. Its main weakness is redundancy — several rules and dependency constraints are restated across steps, output sections, and the Hard Rules list.
Suggestions
Consolidate the reference-verification rules: state them once (e.g., in Step 4.5 / Section I) and have the Hard Rules reference that canonical statement instead of repeating the same constraints three times.
De-duplicate the dependency/QTL-forbidden rules across Step 5, Section C.5, and Hard Rules 16/18 into a single authoritative definition to reduce token cost and the risk of the copies drifting apart.
Move the verbose per-section A–J specifications into a reference file (e.g., a section checklist) so the body stays a lean overview, keeping SKILL.md closer to the progressive-disclosure score-5 pattern.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and directive with no concept-explanation padding Claude already knows, but several rules are restated multiple times (reference-verification rules in Step 4.5, Section I, and Hard Rules 11–13; dependency rules in Step 5, C.5, and Hard Rules 16/18), which is noticeable redundancy rather than the lean score-5 ideal. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable structure — exact output sections A–J, exact redirect text, exact disclaimer wording, explicit intersection formulas (DEG ∩ MR ∩ coloc), and a mandatory dependency check — but defers the actual 8-field workflow template and module/method details to reference files, leaving minor gaps versus copy-paste-ready score-5 guidance. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step always-in-order sequence with an explicit mandatory validation checkpoint (Step 5 Dependency Consistency Check) and a revise-before-output feedback loop ('If any dependency inconsistency is found, revise the plan before outputting'), matching the score-5 anchor with explicit validation and error-recovery. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | All eight reference files are real, clearly signaled one-level-deep links in consistent '→ ... [references/X.md]' format, but the body still inlines substantial material (the 23 Hard Rules and full A–J section specs) that could be partly consolidated, leaving minor organization gaps versus the score-5 ideal. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |