patient-recruitment-ad-gen

Generate ethical, compliant, and patient-friendly recruitment advertisements for clinical trials.

Quality

51%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./scientific-skills/Academic Writing/patient-recruitment-ad-gen/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

50%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The skill has solid domain content (compliance requirements, input schema, real script) but is padded with generic boilerplate and redundant description repetition, and two of its listed reference files are inaccurate. Tightening the body and fixing the references would meaningfully improve the score.

Suggestions

Remove the generic boilerplate sections (Risk Assessment, Security Checklist, Lifecycle Status, Evaluation Criteria, Response Template) and the verbatim description repeats to reduce token bloat.

Add an explicit output-validation step to the Workflow: after generation, verify all Essential Elements are present and no Prohibited Content appears before returning the ad.

Fix the References section: remove the non-existent plain_language_guide.pdf and correct template_examples/ to template_examples.md so all referenced files actually resolve.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is noticeably verbose: the frontmatter description is repeated verbatim in "When to Use" and again in "Key Features", and large generic boilerplate sections (Risk Assessment, Security Checklist, Lifecycle Status, Evaluation Criteria, Response Template) add little skill-specific value.	2 / 5
Actionability	Provides a real packaged script (scripts/main.py), a concrete input-parameter schema, and executable validation commands (py_compile, --help); the only gap is the example invocation's hardcoded /Users/... absolute path, which is not portable.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A 5-step Workflow with a scope check and a fallback path is present, but there is no explicit validation checkpoint confirming the generated ad satisfies the Essential Elements and avoids Prohibited Content before delivery, leaving the core compliance check implicit.	3 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	References are signaled one level deep with clear headers, but navigation is broken: "plain_language_guide.pdf" does not exist and "template_examples/" is listed as a directory when the actual bundle file is template_examples.md.	3 / 5
	Total	12 / 20 Passed

Description

53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is clear and domain-specific about what the skill does, but it lacks an explicit use-trigger clause and only names a single concrete action. Adding a "Use when..." sentence with natural trigger phrases would lift the completeness and trigger-term scores.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. "Use when generating patient recruitment ads, flyers, or posters for clinical trials or when the user mentions IRB/EC recruitment materials."

Include natural synonyms users actually say ("patient recruitment", "study advertisement", "trial flyer") to broaden trigger-term coverage.

Optionally name a second concrete action (e.g. "...and checks them against IRB/EC essential-element requirements") to raise specificity.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain (clinical trial recruitment) and one concrete action ("Generate ... recruitment advertisements"), but the adjectives "ethical, compliant, and patient-friendly" describe qualities rather than additional actions, so coverage is not comprehensive.	3 / 5
Completeness	It clearly answers "what" (generate compliant recruitment ads for clinical trials) but provides no explicit "Use when..." trigger clause, which caps completeness at 3 per the rubric guideline.	3 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	"recruitment advertisements" and "clinical trials" are natural terms a user might say, but common synonyms and variations (e.g. "patient recruitment", "study ads", "trial flyers") are missing.	3 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The clinical-trial recruitment-ad niche is mostly distinct with specific triggers, with only minor overlap risk against general medical-writing or generic ad-generation skills.	4 / 5
	Total	13 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: aipoch/medical-research-skills
Path: scientific-skills/Academic Writing/patient-recruitment-ad-gen/SKILL.md
Commit: 63c61d3

Reviewed: 10 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.