Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, instruction-only skill with a clear sequenced workflow, explicit validation checkpoints, and excellent progressive disclosure via one-level-deep reference files. The main weakness is redundant restatement of citation and dependency guardrails across multiple sections and hard rules, which inflates the token budget without adding guidance.
Suggestions
Consolidate the citation-integrity rules into a single canonical statement (Step 4.5 or Section I) and have Hard Rules 11-13 reference it rather than restate it, to reduce repetition.
Merge the dependency-consistency guidance so it lives authoritatively in Step 5 / Section C.5 and is only cross-referenced by Hard Rules 16-20 instead of being rewritten.
Inline at least the 8-field workflow template (or a condensed skeleton) in Step 6 so the body is self-contained for execution rather than fully delegating to workflow-step-template.md.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient but carries notable redundancy: the citation-integrity rules recur in Step 4.5, Section I, and Hard Rules 11-13, and dependency-consistency rules recur across Step 5, Section C.5, and Hard Rules 16-20. Tightening these repetitions would respect the token budget better. Not a 2 because the bulk of the content is purposeful and not padded with concepts Claude already knows. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, actionable guidance — exact verbatim redirect text, the exact Dataset Disclaimer line, specific required output sections A-J with required elements, and concrete method/tool lists (ssGSEA, LASSO-Cox, TIDE/TMB, oncoPredict/PRISM/CTRP). Not a 5 because the body defers the actual 8-field workflow template and detailed module/method specs to reference files, leaving minor execution gaps in the body itself. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 7-step process ('always run in order') with an explicit mandatory validation checkpoint (Step 5 Dependency Consistency Check 'mandatory before output') and a feedback loop ('If any dependency inconsistency is found, revise the plan before outputting'), plus a Section J self-critical review checklist. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-structured overview with clearly signaled one-level-deep references to real files in references/ (study-patterns.md, workload-configurations.md, literature-retrieval-and-citation.md, workflow-step-template.md, analysis-modules.md, method-library.md, figure-deliverable-plan.md, validation-evidence-hierarchy.md), all confirmed present; content is appropriately split and easy to navigate. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |