postdoc-fellowship-matcher

Filter and match postdoctoral fellowship opportunities based on applicant nationality, years since PhD, and research field from a curated database.

Quality

74%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./scientific-skills/Other/postdoc-fellowship-matcher/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is highly actionable and well-structured with good progressive disclosure, but the repeated scope-discipline scaffolding across several sections adds redundancy that could be tightened.

Suggestions

Merge Scope Boundaries, Input Validation, Error Handling, and Stress-Case Rules into a single consolidated "Scope & Boundaries" section to reduce redundancy.

Add an explicit output-validation checkpoint to the Workflow (e.g. verify matched fellowships against the reference before returning) to strengthen the feedback loop.

Show a brief example of the expected output format rather than only describing it, to make the deliverable fully concrete.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean and avoids padding with concepts Claude already knows, but scope discipline is restated across Scope Boundaries, Input Validation, Error Handling, Stress-Case Rules, and Response Template, which could be consolidated.	3 / 5
Actionability	Provides copy-paste-ready executable commands (python scripts/main.py with flags) plus complete parameter and field-normalization tables covering common cases, matching the fully-executable anchor.	5 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A clear 5-step workflow includes a scope-validation checkpoint (step 2) and incomplete-input handling (step 5) with an error-handling fallback, but lacks an explicit output-validation feedback loop.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	The body is an overview with a well-signaled one-level-deep reference (references/fellowships.md) and a script, with fellowship detail appropriately split out, matching the clear-overview anchor.	5 / 5
	Total	17 / 20 Passed

Description

70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and distinctive with a clear niche, but lacks an explicit "Use when..." trigger clause, which caps its completeness. Adding concrete trigger phrasing would lift the weakest dimension.

Suggestions

Append a "Use when..." clause naming natural triggers, e.g. "Use when a postdoc applicant needs to find eligible fellowships by nationality, career stage, or research field."

Add common synonyms users actually say ("postdoc funding", "postdoctoral grants", "fellowship search") to broaden trigger-term coverage.

Optionally name one or two more concrete actions (e.g. "rank" or "compare") to push specificity toward the comprehensive anchor.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain and two concrete actions ("Filter and match") with specific matching criteria (nationality, years since PhD, research field) from a curated database, sitting just below the comprehensive multi-action anchor 5.	4 / 5
Completeness	It clearly answers "what" the skill does, but contains no "Use when..." trigger clause or equivalent explicit "when" guidance, so completeness is capped at 3 per the judging guidelines.	3 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Includes natural terms a postdoc applicant would say ("postdoctoral fellowship", "fellowship opportunities", "nationality", "years since PhD", "research field"), though common synonyms like "postdoc", "funding", or "grants" are missing.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	It carves a clear niche (postdoctoral fellowship eligibility filtering by applicant profile) with distinct triggers and minimal overlap risk against other skills.	5 / 5
	Total	16 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: aipoch/medical-research-skills
Path: scientific-skills/Other/postdoc-fellowship-matcher/SKILL.md
Commit: 63c61d3

Reviewed: 10 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.