CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

poster-storyline-builder

Reorganizes a paper into a storyline suitable for scientific posters. Use when planning the section structure, title hierarchy, figure selection, and live-explanation flow for an academic conference poster. Also triggers on "help me design a poster layout", "what sections should my poster have", "how do I arrange my poster", "poster structure for [conference]", or "which figures should I use for my poster".

74

Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, actionable planning skill with a clear sequenced workflow and concrete parameters. The main weakness is progressive disclosure: the provided bundle files (references/guidelines.md, scripts/main.py) are orphaned — never linked or invoked from the body.

Suggestions

Add a short 'References' or 'Extended guidelines' section linking to references/guidelines.md (e.g., 'See [guidelines.md](references/guidelines.md) for design principles') so the bundle file is discoverable.

If scripts/main.py is meant to generate layout plans, reference it from Step 4 ('Deliver the Layout Plan') with an invocation example; otherwise remove it to avoid an orphaned bundle file.

Trim advisory truisms like 'White space is not wasted — crowded posters lose viewers' to keep the body lean and token-efficient.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient with tight tables and parameterized guidance, but a few advisory lines ('White space is not wasted — crowded posters lose viewers') state things Claude already knows and could be trimmed. Not 5 due to this minor padding; not 3 because the bulk is lean and specific.

4 / 5

Actionability

Highly concrete instruction-only guidance: exact word counts per section, space-allocation percentages, figure-count limits (2–4), and font sizes (72/36/24pt) — fully actionable without code, which the rubric explicitly does not penalize.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clearly sequenced 5-step workflow with an explicit validation gate ('If the source material is too sparse to create a layout, ask for the key finding and methods before proceeding'). Not a destructive/batch operation, so the cap does not apply.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is well-sectioned, but bundle files references/guidelines.md and scripts/main.py exist and are never referenced or signaled in the body — 'references present but not clearly signaled.' Not 4 because the navigation gap is material, not minor; not 2 because the inline content is reasonably organized rather than a monolithic wall.

3 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: third-person voice, explicit what-and-when, multiple concrete capabilities, and natural trigger phrases tied to a distinct niche. No meaningful gaps to penalize.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'Reorganizes a paper into a storyline', planning 'section structure, title hierarchy, figure selection, and live-explanation flow' — giving comprehensive coverage of the skill's capabilities.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' (reorganizes a paper into a poster storyline) and 'when' (a 'Use when...' clause plus concrete trigger phrases), matching the top anchor.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Provides comprehensive natural trigger phrases a user would actually say ('help me design a poster layout', 'what sections should my poster have', 'how do I arrange my poster', 'which figures should I use for my poster').

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche (scientific poster storyline/structure planning) with domain-specific triggers that are unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
aipoch/medical-research-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.