Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, mostly lean overview with concrete endpoints and a clear two-mode workflow backed by hard-rule guardrails. Its main weakness is that the scan workflow is procedural rather than fully executable inline, and validation is expressed as rules rather than as explicit verify-fix-retry loops.
Suggestions
Tighten the scan workflow into concrete, runnable commands or a thin script invocation (e.g. show calling the bundled main.py with example arguments) so the core scan is copy-paste ready, not just procedural steps.
Convert the 'Hard Rules' into explicit in-flow validation checkpoints with a verify-fix-retry loop (e.g. after retrieval, verify live access succeeded; if blocked, switch to synthesis mode and re-label) to strengthen feedback loops for the batch/automated operation.
Move the inline Manual Search Templates into references/README.md (or a dedicated templates file) and link to it from SKILL.md, keeping the overview leaner and improving progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is largely lean — workflow steps, hard rules, and search templates are token-efficient and assume Claude's competence without explaining what a preprint or RSS feed is. A few phrasings (the quoted scope sentence, some restated hard rules) could be trimmed. Not 5 because of minor redundant restatement; not 3 because padding is minimal rather than a noticeable problem. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, runnable URLs and search templates (e.g. 'https://www.biorxiv.org/search/[keywords]%20numresults%3A25%20sort%3Arelevance-rank', the arXiv RSS/API URLs) and points to references/README.md and scripts. It is mostly executable, but the scan steps themselves stay at a procedural/cluster level rather than copy-paste ready code. Not 5 because the core scan is not fully executable inline; not 3 because concrete tools and endpoints are given. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 4-step sequence (clarify → scan in two modes → organize/report → hard rules) with mode-branching and an explicit reporting template; Hard Rules act as validation guardrails (e.g. 'Never fabricate...', 'always label...'). Not 5 because validation checkpoints are framed as rules rather than as explicit verify-fix-retry feedback loops within the workflow; not 3 because the sequence and guardrails are present and mostly complete. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is a well-organized overview that signals a single one-level-deep reference (references/README.md, which exists) and a scripts/ bundle; sections are clearly headed and the bulk detail is deferred to the README. Not 5 because only one reference is linked and the body still carries the full search-template/reference list inline rather than pointing out to multiple split files; not 3 because structure and signaling are good and the referenced file is real. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |