Evaluates bias in medical literature (prognosis studies) using QUAPAS criteria. Use when the user wants to assess the quality or risk of bias of a medical paper text.
57
66%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Passed
No findings from the security scan
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./scientific-skills/Data Analysis/quapas-quality-assessment-for-prognosis-studies/SKILL.mdscripts/extract_pdf.py is the most direct path to complete the request.quapas-quality-assessment for prognosis studies package behavior rather than a generic answer.scripts/extract_pdf.py.references/ for task-specific guidance.Python: 3.10+. Repository baseline for current packaged skills.Third-party packages: not explicitly version-pinned in this skill package. Add pinned versions if this skill needs stricter environment control.cd "20260316/scientific-skills/Data Analytics/quapas-quality-assessment-for-prognosis-studies"
python -m py_compile scripts/extract_pdf.py
python scripts/extract_pdf.py --helpExample run plan:
CONFIG block or documented parameters if the script uses fixed settings.python scripts/extract_pdf.py with the validated inputs.See ## Workflow above for related details.
scripts/extract_pdf.py.references/ contains supporting rules, prompts, or checklists.This skill evaluates the risk of bias in prognosis studies using the Quality of Prognosis Studies (QUAPAS) tool. It analyzes 5 domains: Participants, Index Test, Outcome, Flow and Timing, and Analysis.
Input: The user provides the full text of a medical paper.
Study Extraction:
Domain Analysis:
For each of the 5 domains, analyze the text using the questions defined in references/quapas_prompts.md.
Risk of Bias (ROB) Assessment: For each domain, determine the Risk of Bias (Low, High, Unclear) based on the answers to the signaling questions:
Overall Judgment: Determine the overall risk of bias for the study based on the domain results.
Final Output: Generate a JSON object strictly following the schema below:
{
"study": "Author, Year",
"D1": "Low|High|Unclear",
"D2": "Low|High|Unclear",
"D3": "Low|High|Unclear",
"D4": "Low|High|Unclear",
"D5": "Low|High|Unclear",
"overall": "Low|High|Unclear"
}When the user provides a PDF file path, use extract_pdf.py to extract the text content before assessment:
63c61d3
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.