Content
42%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is over-padded with generic process boilerplate and contains API/CLI examples that do not match the bundled script, undermining executability. Trimming the template sections and aligning code examples to the actual scripts/main.py surface would substantially improve quality.
Suggestions
Remove the duplicated description text in 'When to Use' and 'Key Features' and cut generic template sections (Output Requirements, Response Template, Input Validation, Error Handling) that restate process concepts Claude already knows.
Replace the fabricated Quick Start/Core Capabilities examples with the real API surface: scripts/main.py exposes RadiologyQuiz.generate_quiz(cases) with a --demo/--cases CLI, not create/create_case/set_difficulty or scripts/radiology_quiz.py.
Tie the Workflow steps to concrete validation checkpoints (e.g. run py_compile, then python scripts/main.py --demo) so the sequence has explicit feedback loops rather than generic fallback language.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is noticeably verbose with generic template boilerplate (Output Requirements, Response Template, Input Validation, Error Handling, Implementation Details) explaining process concepts Claude already knows, plus duplicated copies of the description text in 'When to Use' and 'Key Features'. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | The audit commands (py_compile, --help) are executable, but the Quick Start and Core Capabilities code examples reference non-existent methods (create, create_case, set_difficulty) and the CLI cites scripts/radiology_quiz.py instead of the actual scripts/main.py, leaving key details incomplete. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A five-step Workflow and Example run plan are present, but validation checkpoints are implicit and untied to the actual quiz-generation steps, and the fallback path is described generically rather than as a concrete feedback loop. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | There is one real, clearly signaled one-level reference (references/audit-reference.md) and a scripts/ entry, but the reference largely duplicates body content and large amounts of generic guidance are inlined rather than split out. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 11 / 20 Passed |