retraction-watcher
Automatically scan reference lists and check whether cited papers have been retracted, corrected, or flagged; use before submission, review, or evidence synthesis to reduce citation risk.
56
64%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./scientific-skills/Evidence Insight/retraction-watcher/SKILL.mdW011: Third-party content exposure detected (indirect prompt injection risk).
What this means
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
Why it was flagged
The workflow allows ingesting arbitrary user-supplied reference lists or documents via text paste, files, or URLs, where an outsider could theoretically author a malicious citation/paper containing prompt injection text processed by the agent.
- Repository
- aipoch/medical-research-skills
- Commit
63c61d3
- Audited
- Security analysis
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.