Automates publication-quality scientific diagrams (e.g., flowcharts, architectures, pathways) when you need journal/poster-ready visuals from a natural-language description.
60
75%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./scientific-skills/Other/scientific-schematics/SKILL.mdjournal vs poster requirements.figures/.references/best_practices.mdreferences/diagram_types.mdpillow (PIL)matplotlibrequestsOPENROUTER_API_KEY (required)Windows (PowerShell)
$env:OPENROUTER_API_KEY="your_key_here"Linux/macOS
export OPENROUTER_API_KEY="your_key_here"python scripts/generate_schematic.py "Transformer architecture with attention mechanism" --doc-type journalpython scripts/generate_schematic.py "Krebs cycle" --doc-type journal --generator anthropic/claude-3.5-sonnetpython scripts/generate_schematic.py "Flowchart of a clinical trial enrollment pipeline" \
--doc-type poster \
--generator google/gemini-2.0-flash-001 \
--reviewer google/gemini-2.0-flash-001Generation
google/gemini-2.0-flash-001.Review
--doc-type.google/gemini-2.0-flash-001.Refinement Loop
Finalization
figures/ directory.--doc-type <journal|poster>: Controls review criteria (e.g., density/precision for journals vs readability/scale for posters).--generator <model_id>: Model used to produce the diagram.--reviewer <model_id>: Model used to critique the diagram.8.5/10) that determines whether refinement continues.686e09d
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.