slide-deck-for-lab-meeting

Structures research progress into focused and actionable slides for lab meetings or project reviews without inventing missing content.

Quality

64%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./awesome-med-research-skills/Academic Writing/slide-deck-for-lab-meeting/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The skill is well-structured with clear references and an actionable, sequenced workflow, but it suffers from substantial repetition across multiple sections that inflates the token budget.

Suggestions

Merge the redundant Task, Core Function, and Execution sections into a single workflow description to remove the repeated restatements.

Consolidate Hard Rules, What This Skill Should Not Do, and Scope Boundary's negative cases into one boundary section to avoid saying the same prohibitions three times.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is noticeably verbose with heavy redundancy across the Task, Core Function, Execution, Hard Rules, and What This Skill Should Not Do sections, which restate the same points multiple times.	2 / 5
Actionability	Concrete guidance is provided through a 9-step execution flow and a mandatory A-I output structure with specific section deliverables, with only minor gaps.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	Steps 1-9 are clearly sequenced with an Input Match Check acting as a validation checkpoint before full structuring, though no explicit error-recovery feedback loop is specified.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Seven reference files are all real, one level deep, and each is clearly signaled with a when-to-use description, giving easy navigation and appropriate content split.	5 / 5
	Total	15 / 20 Passed

Description

65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is clear and well-scoped to a distinct niche, but it lacks an explicit "Use when..." trigger clause and lists only one concrete action, capping completeness and specificity.

Suggestions

Add an explicit "Use when..." clause naming concrete triggers such as preparing a weekly lab meeting deck or organizing a PI project update.

List 1-2 more concrete actions (e.g. prioritizes decision-relevant findings, frames open problems) to lift specificity toward the 4-5 anchors.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	"Structures research progress into focused and actionable slides" names the domain and one concrete action (structuring into slides) but does not enumerate multiple specific actions, matching the 1-2 concrete actions anchor.	3 / 5
Completeness	The "what" is clear (structures research progress into slides), but there is no explicit "Use when..." trigger clause, so per the boundary guidance completeness is capped at 3.	3 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Natural terms like "research progress", "slides", "lab meetings", and "project reviews" are phrases users would actually say, with only minor synonyms missing.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The niche is clearly defined as lab-meeting/project-review slide structuring with the distinctive "without inventing missing content" qualifier, giving minimal conflict risk with other skills.	5 / 5
	Total	15 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: aipoch/medical-research-skills
Path: awesome-med-research-skills/Academic Writing/slide-deck-for-lab-meeting/SKILL.md
Commit: f5ef65b

Reviewed: ~10 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.