Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a runnable end-to-end example and well-organized one-level-deep references, but it is weighed down by generic boilerplate sections, some re-explanation of basic statistics, and a broken reference to the missing primary decision-aid file.
Suggestions
Create the missing `references/test_selection_guide.md` (or repoint lines 24 and 124 to an existing reference) so the 'primary decision aid' actually resolves.
Trim the generic boilerplate sections (Required Inputs, Output Contract, Failure Handling, User Checkpoints, Input Validation, Quick Validation) to only skill-specific essentials, since much of that guidance is not specific to statistical analysis.
Condense the conceptual test-selection mappings in 'Implementation Details §1' or move them into the reference file, avoiding re-teaching basic statistics Claude already knows.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The core content (dependencies, runnable example, reference pointers) is efficient, but ~45 lines of generic boilerplate (Required Inputs, Output Contract, Failure Handling, User Checkpoints, Input Validation, Quick Validation) and a conceptual re-explanation of basic test-selection mappings Claude already knows add noticeable padding that could be trimmed. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a fully executable, end-to-end Python example that generates synthetic data, runs assumption checks, performs a t-test with effect size and CI, does power analysis, and emits an APA-style string — copy-paste ready and covering the common case. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence (test selection → assumption checks → analysis → power → reporting) is given in both 'When to Use' and the numbered example, with assumption checks acting as a validation gate and remedies described for failures; the validate→fix→retry loop is only implicit rather than an explicit checkpoint, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is good — a concise overview with clearly signaled, one-level-deep references to four real reference files and one real script — but `references/test_selection_guide.md` is referenced twice (even called 'the primary decision aid') yet does not exist in the bundle, a navigation gap that keeps it below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |