Content
53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-organized and provides a concrete knowledge-base template and source-priority rules, but the actual search workflow is underspecified — no sequenced steps or validation checkpoints — and it carries promotional padding and a stale hardcoded date. Tightening the workflow and trimming the footer would lift the weakest dimensions.
Suggestions
Add a numbered workflow (search each channel → compare findings → resolve conflicts by source priority → save to knowledge base) with an explicit validation checkpoint before saving, so the multi-step process is sequenced rather than implied by section order.
Remove the promotional footer block and the hardcoded "最后更新: 2025-11-07" date, and drop the 何时使用 section that duplicates the frontmatter description's triggers — this padding costs tokens without adding guidance.
Make the search execution concrete: specify which channels to query in what order, roughly how many sources constitute cross-validation, and when to stop searching, instead of the vague "多渠道搜索" directive.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient bullet lists, but the promotional footer ("花叔出品 | 公众号「花叔」| 30万+粉丝"), the hardcoded date "最后更新: 2025-11-07" (time-sensitive, not in a deprecated section), and the 何时使用 section re-listing the description's triggers add unnecessary tokens. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | The save-file template and keyword combination examples ("主题 + 年份：`AI detection 2025`") are concrete, but the core execution is vague — "多渠道搜索" gives no steps, no channel-specific commands, and no criteria for when enough sources have been consulted. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The search → verify → save flow is only implied by section order rather than sequenced steps; partial validation guidance exists ("信息冲突时，优先采信权威来源", "不确定的信息向用户说明") but there are no explicit checkpoints in the workflow. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are needed; sections are well-organized with the save-format template appropriately inline. The ~78-line body exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill exception, so it does not reach the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |