CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

huashu-material-search

搜索个人素材库1800+条真实经历和观点,为内容增加人味。当用户提到"个人经历"、"真实案例"、"素材"、"人味"时使用。

Quality

76%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./huashu-material-search/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The skill is highly actionable, with concrete Grep parameters, file paths, patterns, and excellent worked rewrite examples, and its search workflows are clearly sequenced. It is held back by heavy redundancy (rewrite rules stated four times) and a monolithic single-file structure that inlines scenario examples, FAQ, and promotional material that belong in reference files.

Suggestions

State the rewrite rules (扩展成长文逻辑/保持真实态度/不要直接复制) exactly once and reference that section; they currently appear in 方法A, 方法B, 改写规范, and 注意事项, costing significant tokens.

Move the four detailed 场景 walkthroughs and the 改写示例对比 into a reference file (e.g. references/改写示例.md), keeping one-line pointers in SKILL.md, and fold the FAQ plus 素材库概况 theme counts into the referenced 索引/使用规范 files.

Drop the promotional footer (公众号/粉丝数/代表作) and 成功案例 section from SKILL.md — they add no operational guidance for executing the skill.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body repeats the rewrite rules four separate times (方法A步骤3, 方法B步骤4, 改写规范, 注意事项#3), includes a promotional footer ("公众号「花叔」| 30万+粉丝"), a 成功案例 section, and four fully-worked multi-paragraph scenario examples, making it noticeably padded rather than only loosely trimmed.

2 / 5

Actionability

Guidance is fully executable: exact Grep tool parameter blocks with absolute paths, concrete regex patterns ("高德|扫街榜", "Cursor|Claude Code|Copilot|GitHub"), bash one-liners with flags, and before/after rewrite examples that cover the common use cases copy-paste ready.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Both methods are clearly sequenced (搜索→提取→改写) with numbered steps and an error-recovery fallback in Q1 (调整关键词→扩大范围→查索引→不用素材), but checks like timeliness verification appear only in the FAQ rather than as explicit checkpoints in the main workflow.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist and all material — four detailed scenario walkthroughs, FAQ, and full rewrite do/don't examples — is inlined in a single ~360-line file; section headers are well-organized, but content that clearly belongs in separate reference files sits inline, fitting the 'could be better organized' anchor.

3 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description that clearly states what the skill does and gives explicit, natural use-when triggers in the user's own phrasing. Its only gaps are modest: slightly thin capability enumeration and trigger terms that are natural but not exhaustive of common synonyms.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain ("搜索个人素材库1800+条真实经历和观点") and one concrete action (searching the library) plus an outcome ("为内容增加人味"), but does not enumerate the other capabilities (topic matching, rewrite suggestions) that the body documents, matching the anchor for 1-2 concrete actions without comprehensive coverage.

3 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly answers both questions: what ("搜索个人素材库1800+条真实经历和观点,为内容增加人味") and when ("当用户提到...时使用") with concrete quoted trigger phrases, matching the top anchor exactly; the 'when' clause is explicit, not merely implied.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

It lists natural trigger phrases a user would actually say ("个人经历"、"真实案例"、"素材"、"人味") with an explicit use-when clause, but misses common variations such as "经历"、"案例"、"写作素材" or "真实观点", so coverage is good rather than comprehensive.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A single-person material library of 1800+ posts is a clear niche with distinct triggers, but fairly generic terms like "真实案例" could overlap with general research or case-lookup skills, leaving minor overlap risk rather than minimal.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository

alchaincyf/huashu-skills

Path

huashu-material-search/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.