Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-organized, actionable guide for a simple instruction-only skill: a typed catalog of topic directions, a ready output template, and concrete title formulas. Its weaknesses are promotional/date padding that wastes tokens and an implicit rather than explicit workflow sequence.
Suggestions
Remove the promotional signature block (花叔出品/公众号/30万+粉丝/代表作) and the '最后更新' date line from the body — they consume tokens without adding instructional value; if provenance matters, keep only a one-line pointer.
Replace the 'xxx' placeholders in the 选题模板 with one fully filled example so the expected output shape is unambiguous on first use.
State the workflow as an explicit ordered sequence (e.g. 1. 读取brief → 2. 生成3-4个选题 → 3. 等待用户选择 → 4. 用户选择后进入下一步) instead of distributing it across 核心功能 and 注意事项, and de-duplicate the repeated '等待用户选择' rule.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient (bullet lists, template, title formulas), but contains unnecessary padding: the promotional signature block ("花叔出品 | AI Native Coder…30万+粉丝…AppStore付费榜Top1"), the date stamp "最后更新: 2025-11-07" (time-sensitive content not in a deprecated section), and "等待用户选择，不要假设" repeated three times across 核心功能 and 注意事项. This matches anchor 3 (mostly efficient with some unnecessary content) rather than anchor 4's minor trims. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete markdown output template, four typed topic directions with workload ratings (⭐ scale), and title formulas with worked examples ("A vs B，差距有多大？", "我用XX，3个月做到了YY"). Falls short of anchor 5 because the template uses unfilled placeholders ("xxx") rather than one concrete filled example. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A simple single-purpose skill whose flow is clear: 何时使用 triggers, 核心功能 lists generate → present contents → wait for user choice, and the wait-for-selection checkpoint is stated as a hard rule. Not anchor 5 because the sequence is implied by section order rather than given as an explicit ordered workflow with checkpoints. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent), and the ~90-line body is well organized with clear section headers and appropriately inlined content. The two external references ("/写作参考/", "/公众号写作/_briefs/") are listed but not clearly signaled as navigable reference material, keeping this at anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |