Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-sequenced, highly actionable workflow with strong validation checkpoints and properly offloaded reference files. Its main weakness is token efficiency: a non-functional personal bio footer and some redundant emphasis/tables dilute an otherwise lean skill.
Suggestions
Remove the personal branding footer ('花叔出品 | AI Native Coder | 公众号 | 30万+粉丝 | 代表作') — it carries no skill function and wastes context-window tokens.
Collapse the three repetitions of 'do not skip the proposal step' (核心原则 / 禁止跳过 / 这是最关键的一步) into a single emphatic statement to cut redundancy.
De-duplicate the inline aesthetic tables (验证过的好风格, 花叔科技账号配色) against references/style-gallery.md, keeping only essentials inline and pointing to the gallery for the full set.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Most content is genuinely domain-specific (aesthetic profile, palettes, prompt keywords) and earns its place, but the personal bio footer ('花叔出品 | 30万+粉丝 | 代表作：小猫补光灯'), triple-repeated 'don't skip the proposal' emphasis, and overlapping inline style/palette tables are padding that could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides a copy-paste-ready prompt template, exact commands with flags (uv run generate_image.py --resolution 2K), concrete hex colors, and HTML specs with explicit dimensions and font-family — concrete and executable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 5-step sequence with explicit validation in Step 4 (中文渲染/比例/风格/署名 checklist, design review scoring) and feedback loops for error recovery (文字有误→HTML兜底, 大改→回到Step 2重新提案). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Body serves as an overview with clearly signaled, one-level-deep references to real files (references/style-gallery.md, references/design-guidelines.md) listed in a dedicated '参考文件' section, with easy navigation. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |