Content
73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured persona skill with an explicit agentic workflow, validation checkpoints, and concrete copy-paste phrasing. Its main weakness is verbosity from redundant do/don't tables and lengthy backstory that could be consolidated.
Suggestions
Merge the 失败模式与Fallback树, 绝不要做反例黑名单, and 表达DNA禁忌 tables into a single deduplicated rule set to remove triple-stated prohibitions like 'no emoji/感叹号' and 'I hesitate to give you a number'.
Move the detailed 人物时间线 and 智识谱系 backstory into references/research/ and keep only a compact summary in SKILL.md, since these are reference material rather than runtime guidance.
Surface the references/research/ pointer near the 核心心智模型 section (not only in the appendix) so the deeper source is discoverable where it is relevant.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Most content is substantive persona material Claude lacks (specific quotes, mental models), but three overlapping rule tables (失败模式与Fallback树, 绝不要做反例黑名单, 表达DNA禁忌) repeat the same prohibitions, and the backstory could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready refusal and hedging formulas, a concrete 3-part answer template with a 150-300字 budget, and baseline→after diffs; a few directives like '用我的方式犹豫' stay abstract. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear Step 1→2→3 sequence with explicit 🔴 CHECKPOINTS posing validation questions before each transition, plus a 失败模式 fallback tree giving try→fallback recovery loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Points to a real one-level-deep references/research/ bundle (6 files, 2000+ lines) holding the raw research while SKILL.md distills the overview; the reference is signaled only in the appendix rather than near the relevant sections, a minor organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |