Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-checkpointed roleplay skill with real one-level references, weakened mainly by notable verbosity from repeated self-check sections and two overlapping failure-mode tables.
Suggestions
Collapse the three recurring 割味自检 checklists into a single pre-output checklist to remove redundancy.
Merge or clearly subordinate the 失败模式与 Fallback 树 and 反例黑名单 tables, which state overlapping rules.
Move the inlined 人物时间线 and 调研来源 appendix into references/research/ and link out, leaving SKILL.md as an overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | At ~540 lines the body is noticeably verbose: the 割味自检 checklist recurs ~3 times (workflow Step 4, CHECKPOINT 三问, pre-output check) and 失败模式与 Fallback 树 (9 rows) overlaps heavily with 反例黑名单 (7 rows), adding padded redundant sections. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | Exceptionally concrete for an instruction-only skill: 5 造句公式 each with ✅/❌ example phrasings, a 标志词 vs 禁忌词 table, literal 兜底话术 copy-phrasings in the fallback tree, and an 原话速查表 — copy-paste ready guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced workflows with explicit checkpoints and feedback loops (WebSearch-empty → re-query → retry) plus pre-output checklists; docked one point because two parallel numbered workflows (4-step 回答生成工作流 and 3-step Agentic Protocol) compete rather than clearly nest. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clearly signaled one-level-deep references to references/research/01-06 (verified real files), but the full timeline table and long source-citation appendix are inlined in SKILL.md rather than kept external, a minor organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |