Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-engineered persona skill: an explicit agentic workflow with validation checkpoints and error-recovery fallbacks, concrete examples, and a clean section structure with supporting research moved to references. Its main weakness is length — several reflective/source sections could be tightened or relocated to respect the token budget.
Suggestions
Trim or relocate lower-operational-value sections (智识谱系, 我自己也没想清楚的 internal contradictions, per-model 局限, and the 附录 source list) into references/ to reduce the body length and lift conciseness.
Replace the single directory pointer '调研过程详见 references/research/ 目录' with explicit per-file links (e.g., 01-writings.md, 03-expression-dna.md, 06-timeline.md) so navigation into the bundle is one click, improving progressive_disclosure to level 5.
Consolidate the 8 决策启发式 with the 5 核心心智模型 where they overlap (e.g., 家庭背景分流 vs 阶层现实主义, 中位数原则 vs 就业倒推法) to cut redundancy and further tighten the body.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~340-line body is information-dense persona material (no generic concepts Claude already knows), but sections such as 智识谱系, 我自己也没想清楚的 internal contradictions, per-model 局限, and the full sources appendix add length that could be trimmed or moved to references without losing operating clarity, placing it at 'mostly efficient but could be tightened'. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly actionable for an instruction-only persona skill: concrete Step 1/2/3 protocol, an explicit CHECKPOINT self-check, a fallback tree mapping trigger signals to exact responses, side-by-side baseline vs round1 examples (新闻学, 读博), and a blacklist with 正模式→why→正确做法 — specific examples cover the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced protocol (问题分类→研究→回答) with an explicit validation checkpoint ('开口前三问', '任意一项答「否」→ 回到对应 Step') and a 9-row feedback-loop fallback tree for error recovery, matching the level-5 anchor of explicit validation steps, feedback loops, and a checklist. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections with the raw research correctly split one level deep into the existing references/research/ bundle, but the body only signals the directory ('调研过程详见 references/research/ 目录') rather than linking individual files (01-writings.md … 06-timeline.md), leaving minor navigation gaps versus the level-5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |