Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured multi-scenario skill body with high information density, concrete thresholds and commands, per-task reference routing, and explicit correction loops. The main improvement room is trimming duplicated reference listings and tightening a few underspecified operational steps.
Suggestions
Consolidate the reference routing: merge the '每次激活先读什么' list and the '参考索引' section into one annotated index so each file's purpose is stated exactly once, saving tokens on every activation.
Trim the nine inline Tibo principles to the two or three that must be visible at all times, and defer the rest to references/tibo_core_principles.md, which already exists for that purpose.
Make the vague operational steps concrete: specify how to locate the collection CLI when it is not on PATH (e.g., candidate directories or a discovery command), and turn the scenario E chart-check into an explicit validate→fix→re-check sequence.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is densely telegraphic with no padding that explains concepts Claude already knows, but there is minor duplication: the reference set is listed both in '每次激活先读什么' and again in '参考索引', and the nine Tibo principles are summarized inline even though references/tibo_core_principles.md holds the full version — anchor 4 (efficient with minor trimmable instances) rather than anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance dominates: "目标≥100条且≥14天", "给3个有实质区别的开头", evidence-level taxonomy, and exact commands like `git ls-remote --tags --refs --sort=-v:refname origin 'v*'`; a few steps remain vague ("CLI不在PATH先找已安装入口" gives no lookup procedure), placing it at anchor 4 with minor gaps rather than fully copy-paste-ready. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Scenarios A–E are numbered with clear sequencing, and feedback loops exist (independent review agent in scenarios A/E, 截图检查 before delivering charts, 回流与纠错 correction loop, 7-day retry after failed update check); the batch collection workflow in scenario E carries validation (unique-ID dedup, insufficient-sample marking) so the missing-validation cap does not apply, but several checkpoints are stated as policies rather than explicit validate→fix→retry steps — anchor 4. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Every referenced file exists in the bundle; the body routes per task ('写作/选题：writing-workshop.md；策略：growth-monetization.md；诊断：quality-analytics.md；平台机制：algorithm-niche.md') plus a purpose-annotated reference index, and references/research/ is explicitly gated as deprecated '查来源用' only — a well-signaled, effectively one-level-deep structure matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |