Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with strong, validated workflows and clean one-level progressive disclosure. Its only real weakness is conciseness — several narrative/confessional sections and the full micro-example block add tokens that don't advance the instruction.
Suggestions
Trim the 实测微例 section to one compact before/after sketch (or move full examples into references/) to cut verbatim tweet tokens.
Collapse the 诚实边界 six-item list and 导师定位 positioning into a single concise scope/boundary line; the caveats are largely implied by the operational rules.
Move the git 版本自检 block into a short reference file or a one-line conditional, keeping the main body purely operational.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The operational core is dense and useful, but several non-instructional sections pad the body — the intro quote, the "我能帮你的/我不能帮你的" positioning list, the full verbatim 实测微例 tweets, the 6-item 诚实边界 confession, and the git version-self-check block — which add tokens Claude doesn't strictly need. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable guidance: numbered Steps per scenario, concrete character limits (120-130), named tools (computer-use/claude-in-chrome), file schemas, and weekly action plans (周一/周三/周五), covering the common cases copy-paste ready. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Each scenario is a clearly sequenced multi-step flow with explicit 【检查点】 checkpoints, a STOP CHECKPOINT gate (3 questions per scenario), and a fallback tree with recovery loops; batch/report operations carry validation (样本量≥50, 时间跨度≥14天). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview with a routing table and a verified reference index; all 11 referenced files exist, references are one level deep (operation layer + research layer), and navigation is well signaled via "按需加载". | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |