Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, actionable, and clearly organized as a decision guide, with executable bulk-read examples and concrete configuration; its main weakness is a referenced template file that is not present in the bundle.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence (e.g. "A shunt answer is for understanding, not for producing a diff"), with only minor instances that could be trimmed such as the aside distinguishing whole-turn routing. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives concrete, copy-paste-ready commands ("bulk-read \"how does token refresh work?\" src/auth/session.ts" and "get_code_snippet(qualified_name)") plus env-var defaults, with only minor gaps since the custom tools are assumed present. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Decision section lays out clear, unambiguous branches (read raw vs shunt vs graph) for a single-purpose decision skill; there are no destructive or batch operations requiring validation checkpoints, so the simple-skill path applies, though it is a decision matrix rather than a sequenced multi-step workflow. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections (Decision, Usage, Configuration) are well organized and the one reference to `templates/shunt.conf` is clearly signaled and one level deep, but no bundle directories (references/, scripts/, assets/) actually exist, so the referenced file is a dangling path — a minor organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |