Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured, highly actionable, and uses progressive disclosure effectively with real bundle files. Main weakness is mild redundancy between the Description, What-this-skill-does, and Features sections.
Suggestions
Collapse the 'Description' section and 'What this skill does' list into the Features table to remove redundancy with the frontmatter description.
Add an explicit fix-rerun-revalidate retry loop for the '--fix' batch path so the Verify phase spells out error recovery.
Trim the Related Skills table or move it to a reference file, since it adds tokens not needed to execute the core audit workflow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient tables and commands, but the 'Description' section and 'What this skill does' list restate the frontmatter and overlap the Features table, so it could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready commands ('python scripts/a11y_scanner.py /path/to/project --json'), slash-command variants, tool option tables, and a full before/after React example cover the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear Scan/Fix/Verify sequence with an explicit verify+regression checkpoint (Phase 3 baseline), but the '--fix' batch path does not spell out the fix-rerun-revalidate retry loop, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Concise overview with a Reference Documentation table pointing one level deep to 9 verified real reference files plus 2 scripts and 1 asset, all clearly signaled and easy to navigate. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |