Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, lean overview with executable commands, explicit blocking gates, and clean one-level-deep references that all resolve to real bundle files. The main weaknesses are minor: duplicated statements, a workflow whose step 1–2 commands omit the --output json flag that step 3 depends on, and no explicit remediate-and-rerun loop after a gate blocks.
Suggestions
Add --output json (and output file names) to the step 1 and step 2 commands in the Workflow block so step 3's --diff diff.json --campaign campaign.json inputs exist as written.
Remove the duplicated statements: keep "There is no PASS" in either Step 3 or Hard rules, not both, and merge the "Not audit advice" blockquote with the "Periods are policy" rule.
Add an explicit feedback loop after the gates section: on exit 4, remediate the finding, re-export the accounts, re-run the script, and keep both exports as the evidence of removal.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence (no explaining what SOC 2, PCI DSS, or a CSV is), but a few statements are duplicated: "There is no PASS" appears both in Step 3 ("There is no PASS.") and in Hard rules ("No PASS from a script."), and "Periods are policy" repeats the "Not audit advice" blockquote ("Periods and thresholds are your policy"). These minor instances could be trimmed, matching anchor 4 rather than the every-token-earns-its-place anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The Workflow block gives three complete, copy-paste-ready bash commands with realistic flag values, and the Scripts table documents concrete exit codes ("0 clean · 2 findings · 3 bad input · 4 blocked"). However, steps 1 and 2 as written omit --output json (the scripts default to text), so step 3's "--diff diff.json --campaign campaign.json" has no input files — a minor executable gap that keeps this at anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear three-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints: the scripts exit 4 on enumerated gates ("The gates block on (exit 4)" with five listed conditions), and "Prove removals by re-export" supplies a feedback signal. It falls short of anchor 5 because there is no explicit error-recovery loop telling the reader what to do on a block (remediate, re-export, re-run, keep both exports); that loop is only implied. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a genuine overview: workflow, gates, rules, and a script table inline, with all detail pushed to one-level-deep, well-signaled references ("references/joiner_mover_leaver_standards.md — what each framework requires for provisioning, change and removal (7 sources)") and example assets. Every referenced path resolves to a real file in references/, assets/, or scripts/, matching the clear-overview anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |