Conciseness

The body is efficient — a compact routing table, an exit-code contract, and terse forcing questions with recommendations; no concept explanations Claude would already know. A few phrases could be trimmed ('Heavy intake stays in the forked context; the parent gets a digest', the provenance note about launch-your-agent), matching the 4 anchor rather than the lean 5 anchor.

Actionability

Provides copy-paste-ready, complete commands: 'python3 scripts/goal_router.py --out-dir ./my-agent' with documented exit codes 0/3/4, a full loop_compiler.py invocation with all flags, goal_state.py subcommands, and a concrete hand-off payload (goal string, agent_name, out_dir, plan.v1). All three referenced scripts exist in ./scripts/, matching the fully-executable 5 anchor.

Workflow Clarity

The sequence is explicit (run router, act on exit code, compile the loop, fork with the hand-off contract, then 'goal_state.py advance' and digest) with genuine feedback loops: exit 3 'ask the one printed forcing question, then re-route', exit 4 'get one sentence, then re-route', plus hard pre-flight refusal gates. Explicit validation checkpoints and error recovery match the 5 anchor.

Progressive Disclosure

Well-sectioned overview with one-level-deep, clearly signaled references, and every referenced script (goal_state.py, goal_router.py, loop_compiler.py) exists in the bundle's scripts/ directory. However, both advertised reference documents ('../../references/cma-primitives.md', '../../references/loops-and-workflows.md') do not resolve — no references/ directory exists in the bundle — so navigation is only mostly reliable, matching the 4 anchor.

Specificity

Names several concrete actions ('Reads the session goal, routes with goal_router.py and compiles the loop with loop_compiler.py', 'build, launch, grade or schedule') with specific tool names, matching the 'several specific actions; minor gaps' anchor. Not 5 because coverage is not comprehensive — intake/interview, phase management, and the BYOK contract are unmentioned; clearly above 3 since more than 1-2 actions are concrete.

Completeness

Explicitly answers 'when' with concrete trigger phrases ('Use when someone wants to build, launch, grade or schedule a Claude Managed Agent...') and 'what' with the read-goal/route/compile pipeline. Both halves are concrete and explicit, matching the 5 anchor rather than the 4 anchor where 'when' would be less specific.

Trigger Term Quality

Includes verbatim natural user utterances as triggers ("'build me an agent'", "'run this nightly'") alongside 'build, launch, grade or schedule', giving good keyword coverage. Not 5 because common synonyms like 'deploy', 'create', or 'set up an agent' are missing; well above 3 given the quoted natural phrases.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'Claude Managed Agent in their own Anthropic account' carves a clear niche with distinct triggers, but the generic trigger 'build me an agent' could fire on non-CMA agent-building requests, creating minor overlap risk with closely related skills. Mostly distinct rather than minimal conflict risk.