Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized instruction skill with concrete, executable guidance and clean progressive disclosure. It could tighten the Step 3 prose and add an explicit feedback loop, but overall the workflow is clear and actionable.
Suggestions
Tighten Step 3's prose paragraphs (3a–3d) into terser bullet-style guidance to improve token efficiency.
Add an explicit validate/revise loop in Step 2 or 3 (e.g. re-run failed candidates after adjustment) to strengthen workflow_clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and assumes Claude's competence, but Step 3 carries several prose paragraphs of reasoning that could be tightened without losing the actionable guidance. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly concrete guidance — eight named fit checks, a three-constraint rule for suggestions, an explicit professional-quality reject list, and a defined compact-table output format; actionable despite being instruction-only. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence with an opening find-or-check gate and a closing verification handover (Step 5), but no explicit validate-then-retry error-recovery loop, leaving a minor checkpoint gap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-signaled one-level-deep references to real bundle files (references/naming-research.md, references/worked-examples.md) with clear guidance on when to read each, plus a Cross-References section; content appropriately split. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |