Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, lean advisory skill body with executable Quick Start commands, concrete frameworks, and clear sequenced processes. Its main weakness is progressive disclosure: alongside three valid reference files it cites four bundle paths that do not exist, which undermines navigation.
Suggestions
Resolve or remove the four dangling references ('culture-architect/', 'board-deck-builder/', '../agent-protocol/SKILL.md', 'company-context.md') so every path in the body resolves to a real file in the bundle.
Convert the dangling cross-skill pointers into a single clearly-labeled 'Related skills' section that names them as siblings rather than embedding them mid-prose, so readers know they live outside this bundle.
Add the key invocation flags/arguments for the two scripts to the Quick Start block so the commands are fully actionable without opening the script files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence — terse bullets, scannable tables (metrics dashboard, integration matrix), and punchy prose ('Set the direction. Not a 50-page document — a clear, compelling answer') — with only minor sections (the large Integration table, the Tree of Thought explainer) that could be trimmed, matching the 4 anchor for efficient content with minor over-explanation. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready Quick Start commands ('python scripts/strategy_analyzer.py'), concrete numbered frameworks (capital allocation priorities, stakeholder priority order, stage-adaptive horizons), and an Output Artifacts table mapping requests to specific deliverables, but script invocation flags/args are not detailed, leaving minor gaps consistent with the 4 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced processes are present — the strategic planning cycle (annual/quarterly/monthly), the Internal Quality Loop (self-verify → peer-verify → critic pre-screen), and the structured output format (Bottom Line → What → Why → How to Act → Your Decision) — but validation checkpoints are lighter than a true batch/destructive operation, placing it at 4 rather than 5; no destructive/batch cap applies since the skill is advisory. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The 3 references/*.md files and 2 scripts are real and well-signaled with a Resources section and inline 'See references/X for ...' cues, but the body also references four non-existent paths — 'culture-architect/', 'board-deck-builder/', '../agent-protocol/SKILL.md', and 'company-context.md' — breaking navigation, which fits the 3 anchor (structure present but references not all clearly valid/organized) better than 4. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |