Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, highly actionable pre-mortem framework with concrete rating scales, question banks, and a copy-paste output template. It is efficient and well-organized, with only minor rhetorical padding and no explicit validation feedback loops (unneeded for a non-destructive analytical skill).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and assumes Claude's intelligence, but rhetorical flourishes like 'That's not pessimism. It's how you build something that doesn't collapse' and 'Not bad luck — bad assumptions' are mild over-explanation that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable guidance for an instruction-only skill: defined confidence/impact rating scales, a vulnerability formula, dependency-chain and reversibility question banks, and a copy-paste-ready output template covering common plan types. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence (Extract, Rate, Map, Dependency Chain, Reversibility) is well ordered with the output format as a checkpoint, but explicit validation/feedback-loop checkpoints are absent; acceptable for a non-destructive analytical skill, so it sits at 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Self-contained with no external bundle files and well-organized sections (Core Idea, When to Run, Framework, Output Format, Patterns by Plan Type, Hardest Questions, Deliverable), giving clear navigation with no nested references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |