Conciseness

Dense tables and templates with no concept explanations — it assumes Claude's competence throughout. Not 5 because the 'Keywords' section duplicates the description's terms and the 33-skill enumeration is token-heavy padding that could be one line pointing to the routing matrix.

Actionability

Concrete, copy-paste-ready artifacts: '[INVOKE:role|question]' syntax with examples, a score-to-action complexity table, a topic→role routing matrix, board-meeting and synthesis output templates, and a decision-log format with exact file paths. Not 5 because the full routing rules and synthesis framework live in files absent from this bundle, leaving gaps the body itself says exist.

Workflow Clarity

The 5-step session protocol is clearly sequenced with validation checkpoints: a complexity gate before routing, loop-prevention rules with explicit deadlock recovery ('return to founder with... Here's where they disagree'), a review-date scan at session start, and a pre-delivery quality checklist. Matches the clear-sequence-with-feedback-loops anchor.

Progressive Disclosure

In-body structure is good (summary tables inline, pointers labeled 'Full rules in references/routing-matrix.md'), but neither referenced file (routing-matrix.md, synthesis-framework.md) exists in the bundle and '../agent-protocol/SKILL.md' points outside it, so navigation dead-ends. References present and clearly signaled, but unverifiable/broken in the actual bundle structure.

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions ('Routes founder questions', 'triggers multi-role board meetings', 'synthesizes outputs', 'tracks decisions', 'Loads company context'), matching the 'several specific actions; minor gaps' anchor. Not 5 because 'C-suite orchestration layer' is abstract framing and the how is left to the body.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (routes, triggers board meetings, synthesizes, tracks decisions, loads context) and when ('Use when a founder question needs routing to the right advisor... or when a multi-domain decision needs a board meeting convened') with a concrete trigger example. Matches the 5 anchor.

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural terms ('board meeting', 'advisor', 'founder question') plus a literal user utterance example ('should we raise now or cut burn?'). Not 5 because the trigger phrasing leans abstract ('needs routing', 'multi-domain decision') rather than the vocabulary users would actually say.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear router niche with distinct triggers ('Every C-suite interaction starts here'), but the claim combined with a 33-skill ecosystem (board-meeting, decision-logger, context-engine siblings) creates minor overlap risk with closely related orchestration skills.