Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A strong instructional skill body: highly actionable tables, schedules, copy, and benchmarks with almost no padding, organized into clear modes and stages, and cleanly delegating deep detail to real, one-level-deep reference files. The only deductions are minor verbosity and an audit workflow whose method lives entirely in a reference file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with domain-specific data Claude doesn't already know (retry cadences of 3/5/7/3 days, save-rate benchmarks of '10-15% good, 20%+ excellent', a Day 0/3/7/12/15 email schedule) and never explains generic concepts. Minor trims are possible — editorial asides like 'Churn is a revenue leak you can plug. That compounds.' and the Related Skills section, which duplicates the frontmatter's disambiguation. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable for an instruction-only skill: exact survey question and copy ('Yes, cancel my account'), reason-to-offer mapping tables, a day-by-day dunning sequence with subject/tone/CTA, metric formulas with benchmark thresholds, a runnable command ('python3 scripts/churn_impact_calculator.py'), and an output-artifacts table specifying exactly what each request yields. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Three clearly delineated modes, a before-starting context checklist, and a sequenced 5-stage flow with red-flag thresholds ('Save rate <5% → offers aren't matching reasons') serving as checkpoints. Minor gap: Mode 2's audit method (the promised 0-100 scorecard) is only defined in the referenced playbook, and the inline flow lacks an explicit validate-and-iterate loop, keeping this just below the anchor-5 pattern. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md works as an overview: key decision tables stay inline while full decision trees, stage templates, the audit scorecard, and complete email copy are split into two well-signaled, one-level-deep references that both exist and are substantive (~254 and ~276 lines, no nested references), plus a working script. Content is appropriately split and easy to navigate. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |