Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured review skill that is token-efficient and gives concrete commands, questions, and an output template; its small gaps are the unspecified model-script I/O and the lack of an explicit error-recovery branch in the workflow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and punchy ('Persona ≠ ICP. ICP is real.'; 'If a channel's payback is > 18 months, it isn't a channel — it's a hobby.') with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste model commands, six concrete forcing questions, and a fill-in output template, but the model scripts' expected inputs/outputs are not specified, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear three-step sequence (run models → answer six questions → apply verdict) with the GREEN/YELLOW/RED verdict criteria acting as the checkpoint; minor gaps in that no error path is given if the model scripts fail. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into labeled sections with one-level-deep cross-references clearly signaled in the Related section (agent, sibling skill, execution domain); no bundle files exist, and structure is good with only minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |