Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable and well-structured: concrete commands, a gated 5-step workflow, real one-level-deep bundle files, and sharp boundary sections against sibling skills. Its main costs are redundancy — the forcing-question library and anti-patterns recap content that belongs in or already exists in reference files — and an implicit rather than explicit re-lint feedback loop.
Suggestions
Move the 8-question forcing-question library into a reference file (e.g., references/forcing_questions.md) and keep a one-line pointer with the walk order ('lock 1-4 before 5-8'), cutting ~40 lines from SKILL.md.
De-duplicate the Anti-patterns section against references/policy_anti_patterns.md — keep only names plus lint-rule mapping inline and let the reference carry the rationale and sources.
Make the lint feedback loop explicit in workflow step 4: 'fix BLOCKER findings, re-run policy_linter.py, and only publish when it reports zero BLOCKERs'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes competence (no padding explaining known concepts), but the ~40-line forcing-question library and the 8-item anti-patterns section overlap material already carried in references/policy_anti_patterns.md and could be trimmed or pointered. This is 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed' (4), not the fully lean top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance: copy-paste commands with real flags ('python3 scripts/discount_matrix_builder.py --input policy_intake.json --profile saas --output json > matrix.json'), a named intake template with the exact CRM fields to capture, and stated expected outputs ('The sample matrix lints to FAIL with 4 BLOCKERs + 6 MAJORs + 2 MINORs — by design'). Matches the copy-paste-ready top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 5-step sequence (audit → build matrix → design exception flow → lint → publish/quarterly review) with an explicit gate ('Resolve every BLOCKER before publishing the matrix to AEs') and a quarterly re-run cadence. Falls just short of the top anchor because the fix-and-re-lint retry loop is implied ('lint is the gate') rather than spelled out as a validate → fix → re-validate iteration. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good structure verified against the actual bundle: three references with one-line descriptions, a scripts table, and an assets template — all cited paths exist and are one level deep and clearly signaled. Minor gap: the in-body anti-patterns section duplicates content that already has a dedicated reference file (references/policy_anti_patterns.md), so some content that belongs in references is inline. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |