CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

company-os

The meta-framework for how a company runs — the connective tissue between all C-suite roles. Covers operating system selection (EOS, Scaling Up, OKR-native, hybrid), accountability charts, scorecards, meeting pulse, issue resolution, and 90-day rocks. Use when setting up company operations, selecting a management framework, designing meeting rhythms, building accountability systems, implementing OKRs, or when user mentions EOS, Scaling Up, operating system, L10 meetings, rocks, scorecard, accountability chart, or quarterly planning.

72

Quality

89%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

The canonical home for this skill is company-os in alirezarezvani/claude-skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-organized, highly actionable body with concrete rules, tables, and timed agendas. The main defect is dangling references: two files are cited but absent from the bundle, breaking progressive disclosure.

Suggestions

Create the referenced files references/os-comparison.md and references/implementation-guide.md so the cited navigation actually resolves, or inline the essential content and drop the references.

Trim rhetorical flourishes (e.g. 'the pulse is what keeps the company alive', 'you're watching, not managing') to recover tokens without losing the actionable rules.

Add explicit verification checkpoints to the implementation roadmap (e.g. 'After week 1: confirm the accountability chart has one owner per seat and is published') to strengthen workflow clarity.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient with concrete rules and tables, but rhetorical flourishes such as 'the pulse is what keeps the company alive' and 'you're watching, not managing' add character at a token cost that could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Highly concrete, specific guidance throughout: hard limits ('5-15 metrics maximum', '3-7 rocks'), a timed L10 agenda, an example scorecard table, IDS steps, and bad-vs-good rock examples — fully actionable for an instruction-only skill.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Clear numbered sequences exist (the 4-step accountability workshop build and the 30-day quick-start roadmap) with well-defined steps; this advisory skill has no destructive/batch operations, so the validation cap does not apply, but explicit checkpoints are minimal.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is well-structured with clearly signaled one-level-deep references ('See references/os-comparison.md', 'See references/implementation-guide.md'), but no references/ directory exists in the bundle, so the referenced paths do not resolve and navigation is broken.

3 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

An exemplary description: concrete capability list, explicit trigger guidance, third-person voice, and distinctive niche terms. No fluff or over-claims present.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete capabilities — 'operating system selection (EOS, Scaling Up, OKR-native, hybrid), accountability charts, scorecards, meeting pulse, issue resolution, and 90-day rocks' — providing comprehensive coverage of the domain rather than vague abstraction.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' (the six functional areas) and 'when' via a clear 'Use when...' clause with concrete trigger phrases, matching the top anchor exactly.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Comprehensive natural trigger coverage including synonyms and framework names users actually say: 'EOS, Scaling Up, operating system, L10 meetings, rocks, scorecard, accountability chart, or quarterly planning'.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche (company operating systems) with distinctive triggers like 'L10 meetings', 'rocks', and 'accountability chart' that are unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 4 missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.