CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

copywriting

When the user wants to write, rewrite, or improve marketing copy for any page — including homepage, landing pages, pricing pages, feature pages, about pages, or product pages. Also use when the user says "write copy for," "improve this copy," "rewrite this page," "marketing copy," "headline help," or "CTA copy." For email copy, see email-sequence. For popup copy, see popup-cro.

68

Quality

86%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a highly actionable, well-referenced instruction skill: concrete commands, formulas, worked examples, and an explicit headline-scoring checkpoint, with real one-level-deep bundle files behind the links. Its main weakness is redundancy — style principles and annotation/alternatives requirements are each stated twice across sections, which inflates token cost without adding guidance.

Suggestions

Merge the duplicated style guidance: fold 'Writing Style Rules > Core Principles' into 'Copywriting Principles' so 'specific over vague' and the simple/active/confident rules appear once instead of twice.

Consolidate the annotation and alternatives requirements stated in both 'Output Format' and 'Communication' into a single section, keeping one authoritative statement.

Move the page-specific guidance (Homepage/Landing/Pricing/Feature/About) into references/copy-frameworks.md alongside the section templates it already duplicates, and link to it from the body.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Much of the body is genuinely prescriptive, but there is real duplication: "Specificity Over Vagueness" reappears as "Specific over vague" in Writing Style Rules, and the annotations/alternatives requirements are stated twice (Output Format's "Annotations"/"Alternatives" sections versus Communication's "Annotations are mandatory" and "Always provide alternatives"). This fits the 3 anchor ('mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened') — it is not 2-level padding of concepts Claude already knows, but not the 4 anchor's 'only minor instances that could be trimmed' either.

3 / 5

Actionability

The guidance is copy-paste executable throughout: a runnable command ("python3 scripts/headline_scorer.py \"Ship dashboards in minutes, not sprints\"" with a --file --json batch variant), fill-in headline formulas, ❌/✅ before-after examples, weak-vs-strong CTA lists with a formula, and a concrete scoring threshold ("never present a sub-60 headline"). This matches the 5 anchor ('copy-paste ready code or commands; specific examples cover the common cases') for an instruction-only skill.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A discernible sequence exists — check `.claude/product-marketing-context.md` first, gather missing context, establish voice/tone, write, score every headline candidate before picking, deliver with annotations — including an explicit checkpoint ("Score every headline candidate with the bundled scorer before picking one"). It matches the 4 anchor ('clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps') rather than 5 because the flow is implicit in section order rather than an explicit step sequence, and the Quick Quality Check is presented as a list rather than a validate-fix-retry loop.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

References are real, one level deep, and clearly signaled at point of use ("See [references/copy-frameworks.md](references/copy-frameworks.md)" for headline formulas and templates, "See [references/natural-transitions.md]" for transitions, plus the bundled headline_scorer.py script). This fits the 4 anchor ('good structure; most content appropriately placed; references mostly clear') rather than 5 because some inline sections — page-specific guidance and CTA copy guidelines — overlap in kind with what references/copy-frameworks.md already hosts and could be split out to keep the overview leaner.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

91%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description that explicitly answers what and when with verbatim natural-language trigger phrases and enumerated page types, and includes boundary referrals to sibling skills. The only weaknesses are minor: trigger phrases for improving copy overlap with a copy-editing sibling, and the description undersells the concrete deliverables the skill produces.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names concrete actions ("write, rewrite, or improve marketing copy") and enumerates specific page types ("homepage, landing pages, pricing pages, feature pages, about pages, or product pages"), matching the 'several specific actions; minor gaps' anchor. It falls short of the 5 anchor because it doesn't surface deliverables like headline variants, CTA options, or page-copy review that the skill actually provides, and above anchor 3 because coverage goes well beyond 1-2 actions.

4 / 5

Completeness

Both questions are answered explicitly and concretely: what ("write, rewrite, or improve marketing copy for any page") and when ("When the user wants to..." and "Also use when the user says..."). This is the 5 anchor ('clearly and explicitly answers both what AND when with concrete trigger phrases'), not 4, because the when-clause includes verbatim trigger phrases rather than a generic 'use when working with' statement.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

It quotes the exact natural phrases users would say — "write copy for," "improve this copy," "rewrite this page," "marketing copy," "headline help," "CTA copy" — plus page-type keywords, giving comprehensive natural-term coverage with synonyms. This matches the 5 anchor ('comprehensive coverage of natural terms including synonyms') and clearly exceeds the 4 anchor's 'a few natural terms missing'.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

It carves a clear page-copy niche and actively disambiguates siblings ("For email copy, see email-sequence. For popup copy, see popup-cro."), fitting the 'mostly distinct; minor overlap risk with closely related skills' anchor. It is not a 5 because triggers like "improve this copy" could also plausibly match the closely related copy-editing skill, which is not disambiguated in the description.

4 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository

alirezarezvani/claude-skills

Path

marketing-skill/skills/copywriting/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.