Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, well-structured analysis workflow with concrete scanning heuristics and genuinely useful output templates for the matrix and test plan. Its gaps are modest but real: the templates/ reference is dangling (no such directory in the bundle), and there are no validation checkpoints confirming the matrix covers every mapped surface before coverage is reported.
Suggestions
Make the templates/ reference actionable: either list the actual template names/paths inline in step 5 (e.g., 'templates/auth/registration.md, templates/settings/*.md') or include the templates/ directory in the skill bundle.
Add a validation checkpoint to step 3 — e.g., 'Verify every route, component, and endpoint from step 1 appears in the matrix before computing the coverage percentage' — and handle the zero-existing-tests edge case in step 2.
State where templates/ and /pw:generate live (e.g., a sibling skill in the pw plugin) so Claude can resolve those references without guessing.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, well-sectioned steps with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows; both example blocks (the coverage matrix and the recommended test plan) demonstrate expected output formats rather than pad. Matches anchor 5's 'every token earns its place'. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Most steps are concrete and executable — 'Scan route definitions (Next.js `app/`, React Router config, Vue Router, etc.)', extract coverage 'by `page.goto()` calls' and 'by locator usage' — but step 5's 'Which template from `templates/` to use' points to a directory absent from the skill's bundle, so template selection cannot be executed. Fits anchor 4 ('mostly executable guidance... minor gaps') rather than 5's fully executable guidance. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six clearly sequenced steps (map surface → map tests → matrix → prioritize → plan → optional generate) with a user-confirmation gate ('Ask user: Generate tests for the top N gaps? [Yes/No/Pick]') before any generation. Missing validation checkpoints — e.g., verifying every mapped route/component appears in the matrix, or handling a repo with zero spec files — matching anchor 4's 'minor validation gaps' rather than 5's explicit validation steps. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Appropriately single-file: the ~90-line body is well-sectioned with no content that belongs in separate files. However, the references to 'templates/' and '/pw:generate' resolve to nothing in this bundle — a minor navigation gap — so it fits anchor 4 ('references mostly clear; minor organization gaps') rather than 5's easy navigation. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |