Content
76%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, high-signal interrogation checklist with concrete thresholds and a fully specified output template, weakened mainly by an underspecified Workflow section: two argument-less script invocations with no sequencing, no tie-in to the six questions, and no validation of metric availability before the verdict. Progressive disclosure is good but leans on external skill paths.
Suggestions
Sequence the Workflow section: state when each script runs relative to the six questions, what inputs it takes (pass the <plan> data or path), and which section of the output template its results populate.
Add a validation checkpoint before the verdict, e.g., confirm data exists for all six metrics and explicitly flag any unavailable metric as a GAP rather than estimating it.
Either include the analysis scripts in this skill's own scripts/ directory or explain what the external cro-advisor scripts produce and how their output feeds the report, so the commands are self-contained and executable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean bullet guidance with concrete thresholds ("Inbound-heavy: 3x. Outbound-heavy: 4x", "ramp > 90 days", "dominates > 80%") and no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Each question pairs with interpretation rules and numeric thresholds, and the output template is fully specified, but the Workflow section's two bare python commands take no arguments — the <plan> input never reaches them and their role relative to the six questions is unstated — a minor gap against the copy-paste-ready anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence (run scripts → answer six questions → render template → route by verdict) is present but implicit: the Workflow section lists two commands with no sequencing context, and there are no validation checkpoints (e.g., confirming data exists for each metric before issuing the verdict). This is an analytical skill, so the destructive-operation cap does not apply, but checkpoints are missing rather than minor, which holds it at anchor 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections (When to Run, Questions, Workflow, Output Format, Routing, Related) with clear one-level cross-references and no bundle files needed, but the script paths point outside the skill into another skill's directory, a minor navigation gap against the ideal split. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |