Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, actionable orchestrator body with concrete commands, clear workflows, and good sectioning; its main weakness is that all referenced external bundle files are missing, breaking progressive disclosure in practice.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly tight reference material (paths, commands, numbered workflows, anti-patterns) with minor over-explanation in the persona framing ("You exist because...", "You serve:") that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a copy-paste-ready decision-engine command with full flags and concrete Karpathy-gate commands; minor gaps in that the workflow fork steps name specialists but defer the exact subagent_type invocation to a separate section. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Three workflows have clear numbered sequences with checkpoints (kill criteria "STOP and resolve", the decision engine, the pre-commit Karpathy gate); not a 5 because there is no explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop documented inside the workflows. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-structured with clear section headers and one-level-deep, clearly signaled references; held at 4 because every referenced bundle path (../../engineering-team/..., karpathy-coder, grill-me) does not resolve on disk, so navigation to the detail files is not actually usable. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |