Content
90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, highly actionable body with executable commands, concrete schemas, and worked math. It falls just short of top marks on workflow clarity and progressive disclosure due to a missing explicit re-score feedback loop and un-verifiable external references.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop to rescue mode (e.g., 'after applying a fix, re-run the scorer to confirm the bottleneck stage improved') to reach anchor 5 on workflow clarity.
Co-locate or verify the referenced template/scorer/agent paths so the one-level-deep references resolve inside the skill bundle, strengthening progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient with no concept-explanation padding (no 'what a webinar is'), densely packed with actionable modes, commands, tables, and worked math; every section earns its tokens rather than the over-explanation of a 4. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable copy-paste commands (`/cs:webinar plan`, the scorer invocations with stdin and sample variants) plus a concrete input JSON schema and worked funnel math, covering the common cases rather than the minor gaps of a 4. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequences are clear (plan→promote→run→follow up; diagnose→fix→re-run) with one explicit checkpoint ('fix the goal… now'), but rescue mode lacks an explicit re-score-after-fix feedback loop, leaving a minor validation gap short of anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear headers and one-level-deep signaled references (template, script, agent, related skill), but the referenced paths point to external bundles that are not present here and some tables are inlined that could live in separate files, leaving minor organization gaps short of anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |