Conciseness

The body is dense and operational — concrete paths, a 7-step workflow, a compact output template — with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Minor trimmable material keeps it below 5: 'Why Preserved Dissent' spends four sentences on rationale, and 'Stale-Decision Audit' describes another agent's job rather than this skill's actions.

Actionability

Mostly executable: 'Append to ~/.claude/decisions/approved/<YYYY-MM-DD>-<slug>.md', a copy-paste output record template, and specific vault path '~/company-vault/10-decisions/'. Not a 5 because 'Update the raw transcript pointer' and 'Schedule auto-revisit (90 days)' give no mechanism or command.

Workflow Clarity

Clear 7-step sequence with an explicit validation gate — 'Verify it has founder approval (status: APPROVED)' — before writing durable memory. Not a 5 because there is no failure branch (what to do when the memo is not approved) or re-check loop; the gate exists but error recovery is implicit.

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized sections, and the 'Related' block clearly signals one-level-deep references (decision-logger skill, llm-wiki-bridge.md, cs-chief-of-staff agent); no bundle files exist and nothing that belongs in a separate file is inlined. Easy to navigate, matching the clear-overview anchor.

Specificity

States several concrete actions in third person — 'Log a decision to two-layer memory via decision-logger', 'Approved memo becomes durable; raw transcripts kept for reference' — matching the 'several specific actions; minor gaps' anchor. Not a 5 because coverage is narrow: only the log-and-route actions are named, nothing about record format, scheduling, or the revisit audit.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both: 'what' (log a decision to two-layer memory via decision-logger, approved memo becomes durable, raw transcripts kept for reference) and 'when' ('Use when the founder has approved a boardroom memo and the decision must become durable company memory — e.g. right after /c-level-agents:boardroom concludes').

Trigger Term Quality

Natural phrases a user of this system would say — 'decide', 'decision', 'approved a boardroom memo', 'founder', 'durable company memory' — give good keyword coverage. Not a 5 because common variations like 'record a decision' or 'log the decision' are absent.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Scoped to a narrow niche — founder-approved boardroom memos at a specific pipeline stage — with triggers ('approved a boardroom memo', 'durable company memory') that no other generic logging or memory skill would claim. Minimal conflict risk.