Content
90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, lean skill body with executable tooling and a clear six-step workflow. Minor gaps are an absent explicit error-recovery feedback loop and generic rather than topic-labeled reference navigation.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation/feedback loop to the Core Workflow (e.g., after launch: monitor guardrails → if breached, pause and re-plan → re-run with corrected setup) to push workflow clarity higher.
Replace the plain 'See:' filename list with topic-anchored navigation labels, e.g. '**Experiment setup & playbooks**: See references/experiment-playbook.md' and '**Statistics concepts**: See references/statistics-reference.md'.
Add one or two natural trigger synonyms to the description (e.g. 'A/B testing', 'split test', 'experiment readout') to broaden trigger-term coverage.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and well-sectioned, assuming Claude's competence without explaining what A/B tests, p-values, or confidence intervals are; every section earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides two copy-paste-ready, fully-argumented sample-size bash invocations backed by a complete, runnable calculator script, plus a concrete If/Then/Because template and the ICE formula. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The six-step Core Workflow is clearly sequenced with stopping rules and guardrail monitoring as checkpoints, but it lacks an explicit validate-then-fix-retry feedback loop for the batch user-facing operations involved. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is a concise overview that signals one-level-deep references to two real, appropriately-split reference files plus a documented script, though the 'See:' navigation uses generic filenames rather than topic-anchored labels. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |