Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An excellent, well-structured skill body: lean tables, executable commands, four sequenced workflows with validation gates, and a clean one-level-deep bundle layout whose files all exist. The single gap is that error-recovery loops (what to do when an audit fails) are implied rather than explicit.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and purposeful: taxonomy and provider tables, copy-paste commands, terse bullets, and an anti-patterns list. It explains only skill-specific knowledge (cleanup triggers, provider lock-in trade-offs) and nothing Claude already knows, matching the lean anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Quick start gives three copy-paste-ready commands; each tool section shows invocations with real flag values and enumerated strategies with defaults ("ring ... Default for risky launches"). Commands are fully executable, covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | All four workflows are numbered with validation gates ("Run kill_switch_audit.py — must pass before merge", "Deploy at 0%; verify kill switch works", "should now show one fewer flag"). Falls short of anchor 5 because the fix-and-re-run feedback loop on validation failure is implied by "must pass" rather than explicitly stated as a validate→fix→retry loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | All 4 references, 3 scripts, and 1 asset cited in the body exist in the bundle and are one level deep (reference files point back to bundle scripts/assets, not to further content). The References section signals each file with a one-line description, and detail is appropriately pushed out of SKILL.md. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |