Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, well-structured, and actionable, with clear subcommand dispatch and one-level references to scripts. The main gap is that referenced script paths point outside the skill bundle and no inline executable code is shown.
Suggestions
Include a short inline code or command snippet showing how a script is actually invoked (e.g. a sample ratio_calculator.py call with expected output) to lift actionability.
Confirm referenced script paths resolve within the skill bundle, or relist them relative to the skill root so navigation is unambiguous.
Add a brief validation note for batch/forecast outputs (e.g. sanity-checking that forecasts are non-negative) to harden workflow clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient across ~30 lines with no concept explanations or padding; every line (commands, examples, script paths with one-line descriptions) earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable invocations and full script paths, but shows only command syntax rather than inline executable code for the underlying analyses, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | As a single-purpose command dispatcher with four unambiguous subcommands, the simple-skill exception applies; each invocation is a clear single action and the operations are analytical rather than destructive. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections point one level deep to four scripts and a Skill Reference with clear one-line descriptions, but the referenced paths live outside this skill's bundle and cannot be verified as present. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |