Conciseness

The signal→route table and workflow are dense, plugin-specific facts that earn their tokens, but "Why This Is the Killer Command" ("the killer command", "cognitive tax", "This is also where persistent memory pays off") is promotional padding Claude doesn't need, and the intro plus Examples section restate routing outcomes the table already encodes. Fits anchor 3 (mostly efficient, some unnecessary explanation) better than anchor 4, which has only minor trims.

Actionability

Concrete keyword→agent mapping ("burn, runway, fundraise... | cs-cfo-advisor"), named commands (/c-level-agents:brief, /c-level-agents:office-hours, decision-logger), and exact output templates for all three route types make the guidance executable. Falls short of anchor 5 because the invocation mechanics ("invoke that cs-* agent directly", "Log the routing decision (raw layer) via decision-logger") are stated as direction without the specific command form.

Workflow Clarity

The five-step workflow cleanly sequences single-role, multi-role, and ambiguous branches with a designated fallback (office-hours) — anchor 4's clear sequence. No validation checkpoints exist, but the operation is non-destructive routing so the destructive/batch cap doesn't apply; it misses anchor 5 on lacking any feedback loop (e.g., tie-breaking when one question hits keywords in two rows of a single role, or what to do if an agent is unavailable).

Progressive Disclosure

Sections are well-organized and all routing content is appropriately inline for a router skill (no bundle files exist to split into), with external links (cs-chief-of-staff agent, chief-of-staff and context-engine skills) clearly signaled one level deep in the Related section. Anchor 4 fits: good structure with minor organization gaps — the Output examples are long enough they could live in a reference file if the bundle grows.

Specificity

"Auto-routes any founder question to the right C-role advisor or to /c-level-agents:boardroom for multi-role topics" names the domain and concrete routing actions, with worked examples ("'runway pressure' routes to the CFO, 'gross retention dropped' routes to the CCO"). It stops short of the anchor-5 comprehensiveness because the full set of advisors/routes it dispatches to is not enumerated — only two are shown.

Completeness

Explicitly answers what ("Auto-routes any founder question to the right C-role advisor or to /c-level-agents:boardroom for multi-role topics. The single-command entry point.") and when ("Use when a founder asks any strategic question without knowing which advisor or command fits") with concrete trigger phrases — a direct match for the anchor-5 example pattern.

Trigger Term Quality

"runway pressure", "gross retention dropped", "founder", "strategic question" are phrases a founder would naturally say, and they map to concrete routes. A few common trigger synonyms (burn rate, hiring, churn, positioning) are absent, so it fits anchor 4 (good coverage, a few natural terms missing) rather than anchor 5's comprehensive synonym coverage.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clear niche: the single-command auto-router for a C-level advisor suite, explicitly framed as the entry point "without knowing which advisor or command fits". Minor overlap risk with the individual advisor skills it routes to, keeping it at anchor 4 rather than 5.