gdpr-audit-prep

/cs:gdpr-audit-prep <scope> — GDPR audit 6-question Article-cited forcing interrogation. Use before annual internal GDPR review, post-breach internal audit, DPA investigation readiness, or acquisition due diligence.

Quality

81%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

—

The risk profile of this skill

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, information-dense audit-prep skill with concrete commands, a sequenced six-question checklist, and a clear output template. Main improvements: add explicit validation/feedback checkpoints in the bash workflow and consider splitting the large output template into a referenced file.

Suggestions

Insert explicit validation steps between the four bash workflow commands (e.g. verify each script's JSON output parses and required fields are populated before proceeding), turning the workflow into a validate-fix-retry loop.

Factor the ~55-line Output Format template into a referenced file (e.g. references/output_template.md) and link to it, keeping only a short example inline in SKILL.md.

Confirm the referenced scripts under ra-qm-team/skills/gdpr-dsgvo-expert/scripts/ actually exist at the stated relative paths, since no scripts ship in this skill's own bundle.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	Dense, Article-cited bullet content that assumes GDPR knowledge rather than explaining it, though the large Output Format template (~55 lines) and some repeated framing could be trimmed slightly.	4 / 5
Actionability	Concrete bash commands with explicit paths and arguments in the Workflow section, plus a copy-ready output template and per-question checklists; minor gap that the referenced scripts live outside this bundle and cannot be verified executable here.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	The six questions form a well-sequenced checklist with explicit pass/fail criteria and a final verdict, and the four-step bash workflow is numbered; the bash steps lack explicit validation/feedback loops between commands, capping it below 5.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Well-organized into clearly labeled sections with one-level-deep external references signaled in the Related block (playbook, agent, adjacent skills); the entire body lives in one file with no in-bundle references, and the lengthy output template is arguably inline content that could be factored out.	4 / 5
	Total	16 / 20 Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, well-scoped description that explicitly states both the skill's purpose and its trigger contexts with concrete, natural-language phrases. Minor gains possible by adding a couple of common synonyms and splitting the single action into a few enumerated capabilities.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain and concrete action — "GDPR audit 6-question Article-cited forcing interrogation" — giving several specific facets (6 questions, Article-cited, forcing interrogation) though it is a single approach rather than a comprehensive list of distinct actions.	4 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly answers both what ("GDPR audit 6-question Article-cited forcing interrogation") and when ("Use before annual internal GDPR review, post-breach internal audit, DPA investigation readiness, or acquisition due diligence") with concrete trigger phrases.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Strong natural trigger phrases — "annual internal GDPR review", "post-breach internal audit", "DPA investigation readiness", "acquisition due diligence" — that a user would plausibly say; a few common synonyms (e.g. "privacy audit") are absent.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Occupies a clear niche (GDPR audit prep via forcing questions) with distinct, domain-specific triggers that would not plausibly fire for unrelated skills.	5 / 5
	Total	18 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
relative_links	Relative link issues: 3 suspicious	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: alirezarezvani/claude-skills
Path: compliance-os/skills/gdpr-audit-prep/SKILL.md
Commit: 19392f7

Reviewed: ~9 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.