Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable body: numbered workflow with executable commands, explicit validation/escalation checkpoints, and a useful forcing-question library. Weaknesses are minor — repeated cap statements, one inconsistently-specified command (goal_state.py), and references that point outside the provided bundle.
Suggestions
State the max_iterations cap once canonically (e.g., in Workflow step 1) and keep only the Hard-rules reminder — the Tools list repetition of 'rubric required, cap 1..20' is trimmable.
Give goal_state.py the same full invocation form as the other scripts (path prefix and flags) and add it to the Tools list so all commands are copy-paste ready.
Replace the abstract 'append to the running session' with a concrete example of how the user.define_outcome event is sent, or point to the skill/reference that defines it.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean: a 5-step workflow with inline commands, short hard-rules, and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Minor trimmable redundancy keeps it below anchor 5: the cap "rubric required, max_iterations clamped to 1..20" is stated in Workflow step 1, Hard rules ("No outcome without a max_iterations cap"), and the Tools list; the ≤25-thread ceiling is likewise stated twice. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready bash commands with real flags for all three scripts ("python3 scripts/outcome_builder.py --sheet ./my-agent/build-sheet.json --max-iterations 5 --out …") and a concrete SHIP/SHARPEN/ESCALATE/RESUME decision table. Minor gaps: "goal_state.py set --phase run-without-you" lacks the path prefix the other commands carry and is missing from the Tools list, and "Send the payload as a user.define_outcome event (append to the running session)" gives no concrete mechanism — anchor 4's 'concrete code or commands with minor gaps'. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 5-step sequence with an explicit validation checkpoint ("Read every verdict first"), a loop invariant enforcing measurable progress ("each iteration must move ≥1 rubric line fail→pass, or the run halts at the cap and escalates"), error-recovery guidance ("With ≤1 iteration left it flips to 'make the single highest-value fix or escalate now'"), and a terminal decision step. Full feedback loop with escalation paths — anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good structure: an overview body with clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference links ([../../references/loops-and-workflows.md], [../../references/cma-primitives.md]) and per-script detail pushed to scripts. Scored against the actual bundle structure, no bundle files are present (references/, scripts/, assets/ are all absent), so the referenced paths cannot be verified and the links point two directories up outside the skill — a minor organization gap that keeps it below anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |